Hello. My name is Gavin Starks.
I’ve been working at the intersection of business, technology, science, art and media for over 20 years. I’m one of the Trustees of Longplayer and one of my roles is to help us think through how this piece will keep going for another 1000 years, and what that might mean.
I have a lot of questions for us today.
I’ve always been interested in time — I studied both Astrophysics and Electronic Music. A few years ago, when I joined the Longplayer Trust, I asked Jem about the origins of the project. We discussed how time works (and how clocks aren’t really helpful when thinking about it). We talked about how we are obsessed with time, yet rarely take time, or really take time to figure out our relationship with it.
Jem recounted childhood memories with his father; of getting a telescope, looking at the stars and learning from him that they’d been there for millions of years. He told me about tuning into shortwave radio in South America and wondering ‘what’s in between the stations?’. Jem reflected on our sense of time: its vastness; its intangibility; of nightmares about time; of developing an obsession about the idea of time; of playing music and this experience being “on the cusp of controlling time”; that playing music, time seemed almost eternal; that ‘other times’ were “very long presents”; and how Longplayer is still a blip.
Jem learned that stars exhibit acoustic properties and are – in effect – ringing like bells…
The singing bowls were the outcome of a long process of thinking about time, not a starting point. Personally, I am fascinated by the ridiculous nature of time and our attempts to quantify it: from Plank time (10^-44) to the 13 billion years of Cosmological time to the duration of a political idea — to the length of a bad joke.
How are we meant to relate to and across these ideas?
For me, one of the things that is attractive about Longplayer is just the idea of thinking on a longer timeframe, beyond your life, or your children, or grandchildren. 1000 years is 30 to 40 generations and this is at significant odds with the pace of life today. It’s hard to imagine how to think about making something that would last 1000 years. The Longplayer vision not only embraces this 1000 year view. It ‘repeats’.
So what does this mean? How do we begin to think about it?
We have many ways to engage around Longplayer — it’s not just a single piece of music. We’ve held many events, such as today; live performances, shared letters, scores, set up listening posts, sold ‘sponsored days’ and generated conversations. In fact, Longplayer can be considered as a combination of many elements:
Longplayer helps us ask many questions about our world, and our role and meaning in its future. It helps frame questions that are much bigger than us — from culture to climate change. Our conversations are about the long view and how can we explore which elements might be used, how, by whom, and when? The time-frame is big — but it is still not ‘infinite’. The time-bound nature of the project leads us to frame our questions about ‘what’ might be happening in the future differently.
What might our role be in that near-yet-far horizon?
What might our impact be?
How might we communicate across so many generations?
What might be happening on its fifth loop – in the year 7019?
So… How can we ensure it persists?
Firstly, and perhaps unsurprisingly, given I ran the Open Data Institute, I strongly advocate that everything that Longplayer does must be open. Things that are open and shared tend to persist more than those that are not. There are few instances in history where ‘closed’ information persists, and many that show open is the best way to spread ideas. Two simple examples, separated by some centuries: the bible and the web.
Further, If we want people to piece together the next 1000 years of our history, we might ask: would we rather them find things as archaeological artefacts, or as the whole story, or as a curated set of outputs?
In the Netherlands, when an arts organisation –http://societeanonyme.la/ – closed down due to lack of funding, they encoded their entire works (video, sounds, photos, texts) in a printed book, the SKOR codex, copies of which are distributed around the world.
How do we take the long view?
Longplayer is not ideological, new age, nor does it represent emptiness. It challenges us to engage to take the long view: to question what this means to us as individuals; as communities; as societies.
We question what it means to ‘be longplayer’ / to ‘be long’ / ‘belong’. A sense of belonging seems to underpin the work—providing a mechanic for longitudinal thinking, discussion and social engagement. A sense of place that isn’t bound in where, but when.
How can we embody principles of continuity and principles of change?
We considered the question: what else has lasted, or will last, for centuries?
Religions, songs and other music, empires (Roman, Byzantine, Venetian, Japanese), businesses (e.g. the 1000-year-old Japanese hotels). Constructions, objects and things, covering a staggering range: from Tibetan stupas to nuclear waste dumps; pyramids; statues; paintings; books; Knighthoods; tapestries; tiles; accountancy; war; standing stones; mathematics.
And so, looking forward for Longplayer, do we create:
I think one of the reasons we are drawn to Longplayer is the tension of time itself. We feel drawn in with questions and answers that we can grasp, but know that – while it is itself time-bound – the questions and answers it raises are both timeless and infinite.
As we journey through the fantastic programme today, we will navigate through self-generating art, strings that snap, walking sonic environments, explorations of materials, found objects, opera, antique synthesiser prototypes, prime numbers, collaborative writing, bells, reading, flora & fauna, vinyl spinning, improvisation and performance.
We join Jem in celebrating Longplayer and long thinking.
And– – as you journey, I’d like to challenge you as to how you might be…long.
The composition of Longplayer is built around the application of simple and precise rules to six related pieces of music, each a harmonic transposition of an original 20 min. 20 sec. composition (the ‘source music’). Six 2-minute sections from these transpositions – one from each – are playing simultaneously at all times. Longplayer chooses these…
Longplayer is a time capsule that never closes. It rings and rings. It hums, and peals, and rings again. It settles into long moments of near stillness, then rolls back into motion. It continues, without drawing breath. It has done so for nearly ten years now, and should continue to do so for another 990…
There are these other forms of life, artificial ones,that want to come into existence. And they are using me as a vehicle for its reproduction and its implementation.Chris Langton  I think one of the changes of our consciousness, of how things come into being, of how things are made and how they work is…
A millennium seems like a long time. Not as long as eternity. Woody Allen said, “Eternity is a very long time. Especially the bit towards the end.” Eternity is difficult to define while one thousand years seems clear enough. It is one thousand trips around the sun. One thousand years becomes colossal in terms of…
Time it seems is running out. The question is, will we fail it or will it fail us? In the opening hours of the new millennium Jem Finer launched Longplayer, a thousand-year-long musical score calibrated to end precisely on December 31 2999. Composed of six gradually differentiating Tibetan bell-chants, Longplayer loops spirals through its musical…